Get in Touch: USA (Newport, RI): +1 401 848 0111   |           
 
Performance Research logo

Sponsorship analytics and insight


Independent Studies

Study:

Winter Olympic Viewers "Can't Beat the Feeling"

At the conclusion of the 1992 Winter Olympics, advertiser and Olympic Sponsor Coca-Cola broke through the Olympic marketing clutter and posted an impressive audience return.

Performance Research, (Newport, R.I. based sports marketing research firm) tested the awareness, association and image of Olympic sponsors immediately before and immediately following CBS's coverage of the Winter Olympics in Albertville. The study interviewed 700 random adults with 350 interviewed before the opening ceremonies and 350 interviewed after the telecast watching a minimum of four hours of programming.

When asked to recall official sponsors (within hours of the closing ceremonies), almost one-half (47%) of the television audience recalled Coca-Cola. Moreover, Coke's sponsorship awareness more than tripled from pre-event tests where only 12% of those intending to watch the coverage noted their involvement. Also receiving impressive returns were the U.S. Postal Service, Chrysler/Jeep, and Visa, each more than doubling from pre to post testing consumer "top of mind" recall through their Olympic theme advertising.

And which commercial made lasting impressions? Advertisements for Coca-Cola were recounted by 21% of the audience, followed by Reebok (10%), M&M /Mars (8%), McDonald's (7%), Chrysler/Jeep (7%), Visa (6%), U.S. Postal Service and American Express (5%).

Among other categories, viewers were asked to identify the official Olympic car company. Because of their Olympic themed advertisements, Official automobile Chrysler, overcame confusion from Buick's past involvement, and was recalled by 31% of the television viewers (vs. Buicks's 15%). Subaru, long-time U.S. Ski team sponsor, was identified in the same category by nearly one-fifth (18%) of the respondents.

But not all sponsors utilized the Olympic theme in their campaigns. Some, like JCPenny advertised very little during the telecast and did not take full advantage of the costly Olympic rings they paid for so dearly. When asked to identify the official Olympic retailer, both pre and post respondents incorrectly mentioned KMart and Sears more often than USOC sponsor, JCPenny.

So where does corporate image/goodwill fit into all of this? Olympic sponsors were perceived as both "Friendly" and "Global" according to the 7.1 (out of a possible 10) mean ratings they received. Other, less regarded attributes were "Leaders" (6.7), "Innovative" (6.3), and "Healthy" (5.9).

Performance Research interviewed 350 random adult TV viewers immediately before the TV coverage of the Winter Olympics began and 350 TV viewers, who had watched a minimum of four hours of coverage, immediately following the Games? TV coverage. The margin of error is less than one percent.

Full List of Independent Studies


United States Studies

2014 Performance Research / IEG Sponsorship Decision Makers' Survey
The latest report.

BP Oil Spill Ramifications
consumer attitudes to the oil giant and its marketing

Big Three Still Dominate
Study of Olympic sponsorship at Vancouver 2010

Times Square Advertising: Is it over-the-top or top-of-mind? (2002)
A look at how visitors connect to the commercial clutter of Times Square.

At the Olympics, Less May Be More
Study of Olympic sponsorship at Sydney 2000

Americans Welcome Return of Formula 1
Study of sponsorship at the 2000 Indianapolis US Formula One Grand Prix

Log-Ons and Sponsors and Boats, Oh My!
America’s Cup (2000)

Viagra and Lycos Outperform First Year Sponsors to NASCAR
Research at the 2000 Daytona 500

Sponsors Still Live Dream Despite Scandal Nightmare
Consumer attitudes to the Olympics following Salt Lake City Scandal (1999)

NASCAR Fans Say “Welcome Back” to the Dodge Boys!
NASCAR Winston 500 (1999)

Picture This: “The Official Sports Drink of the …….. Symphony?”
Consumer attitudes toward corporate sponsorship of the arts (1997)

Naming Rights, Naming Wrongs
Consumer reaction to sponsorship of arenas and stadiums (1997)

Extreme Games, Commercialism Taken Too Far?
ESPN X-Games audience study (1996)

Watch Out For The Ambush 1996
Study of Olympic sponsorship (Atlanta)

America loses the Cup, but sponsors win over the fans…
America’s Cup sponsorship (1995)

Winners and Whiners
Indy Car Study (1994)

Loyal NASCAR Fans Please Stand Up
Racestat: a comprehensive analysis of the NASCAR audience (1994)

Olympics, What Olympics? Sponsors, What Sponsors
1994 study of Olympic sponsorship (Lillehammer)

AT&T Win Official Race With Sprint
1992 study of Olympic sponsorship (Barcelona)

Winter Olympic Viewers “Can’t Beat the Feeling”
1992 study of Olympic sponsorship (Albertville)

Europe Studies

The Wild, Wild East? Sponsorship in Poland
Study explores attitudes to corporate sponsorship among Poles.

Why Do American Formula One Fans Value Sponsors?
Compares and contrasts opinions of visitors to both the 2000 US and 2000 British Formula One Grand Prix.

HOWZAT!! For Sponsorship
UK cricket sponsorship – beyond awareness (2000)

British Football Fans Can’t Recall Euro 2000 Sponsors
Research into sponsorship effectiveness at Euro 2000

Caution Flags Fly as CART Set for New Arrival
Attitudes of F1 racing fans to the introduction of US motorsports in Britain (2000)

Sponsor Loyalty Left by Roadside
Research at the 2000 British F1 Grand Prix

Sponsors Find Home in Dome
Millennium Dome sponsorship awareness study (2000)

Naming Rights, Naming Wrongs
Consumer reaction to sponsorship of arenas and stadiums (1999)

American Companies Welcome As Smoke Clears From F1
Research among European Formula 1 Grand Prix 1999

Rugby World Cup Findings Are Black And White
Research at the Rugby World Cup 1999